In the Oryol region of small and medium business problems with the purchase of the leased premises

In the Oryol region were studied small businesses whose main objective was finding an answer to the question: how feasible SMBs to buy the lease for business premises. As it turned out, only 4 districts of the bill of foreclosure area SMBs really works, in the remaining 23 municipalities of the Orel region entrepreneurs do not even try to buy the rented premises, as the "law of small privatization" did not come into force. Recall that the study on implementation of the "law of small-scale privatization was undertaken by the Committee for Regional Economic Policy Council. Sociological data committee has received from the fact that contracts of sale with the PSC about buying their rented premises. Copies of the transition of ownership in the hands of small and medium-sized businesses have been derived from only four cities in the area: Eagle, Lieven, and Bolkhov Mtsensk District. In addition, among the four above-mentioned municipalities, only two of them are actively working "Act small-scale privatization." In the town of Lieven only provide 4 copies of the contract of sale, and Bolkhov area - three. We remind you that the Law on small-scale privatization in the Russian Federation entered into force two years ago, although in the Orel region at the outset of its adoption have been difficulties with its use. The problem is that in the Orel region most of the tenancy agreement has not passed state registration. Moreover, it did not create lists of state property, which would determine what property may redeem the SMB. With the adoption of the Law on small-scale privatization "procedure (registries and state registration) have been made in the Orel region in a very short order. It is for these reasons that last year the entrepreneurs of small and medium-sized businesses only in isolated cases received approval for the privatization of real estate (52 PSC). In total, 72 applications were filed by Orel entrepreneurs to purchase real estate, they also rented. With the words SMB: "In my case, when signing the lease, I do not have the item of property rights, this is what was the fact that subsequently the issue of state registration and could not be, despite the fact that, in accordance with the law 159 - FZ, it is mandatory. To fix this, in 2009, my lease was amended. But it did not help me buy and privatizing property. As it turned out, my contract does not meet the statutory deadlines. Nobody even paid attention to what I regularly pay rent for six years, and, moreover, made repairs in the building. " Problems outlined above individual entrepreneur, was global, with her face most of the SMEs. None Orel businessman failed to prove that the tenant was intact. The fact that the "Law of small-scale privatization requires that tenants enjoy the real estate is not less than three years, but in fact the last lease agreement with the employers were only a year, after which it was necessary to conclude a new one. If the contract and shall be concluded for a longer period, then it has not annexed the state registration, but it also did not comply with the law.