On what CMS made Russian sites?

In a new independent rating iTrack presents data on the installation of content management system (CMS) in the blast zone. RU and. RF. The greatest increase in the number of implementations demonstrated Amiro.CMS: annual number of sites running on this platform, increased by 15.86%. In second place - HostCMS (+10,01%), the third - CMS "1C-Bitrix (8.24%). Fourth place is UMI.CMS (+7,4%). Part of the CMS over the past year increased its popularity, while others - have lost many supporters. Sites using the CMS S. Builder, declined by 16.03%. To 17.45% reduction in the number of sites built on ABO.CMS. Leadership among the "outsiders" listed in the ranking iTrack, went to CMS NetCat (-24,63% per year). Data for the I quarter of this year also disappointing for developers for these platforms - only 3 of 9 studied paid CMS showed increase in the number of implementations, and it is - a system in high demand throughout the year (in descending order of growth: Amiro.CMS, "1C- Bitrix ", UMI.CMS). The study iTrack analyzed more than 3.7 million Web projects in the Russian domain zone. RU and. RF. The most common system is CMS "1C-Bitrix: Site Manager: in the first quarter of 2011 it was used more than half the sites built on commercial platforms (55.45%). Second place at NetCat (18,79%), followed by HostCMS (8,68%) and UMI.CMS (7,55%). In the five most popular fee-based "engine" is also Amiro.CMS (5,04%). The rest of the system, trapped in a rating (SiteEdit, TwilightCMS, ABO.CMS, S. Builder), are a fraction of implementations (from 0.28% to 2.62%). In 2011, the method of data collection company iTrack was subjected to audit by Microsoft, which agreed with the correctness of the results of the study.